Wednesday, November 23, 2011

'Breaking Dawn' Box Office: What It Means For 'Part 2'

 Box-office experts weigh in on whether 'Twilight' series can top blockbuster 'Harry Potter' finale.

 



Opening weekend has come and gone for the first part of the "Twilight Saga" finale, and "Breaking Dawn - Part 1" bowed to an impressive $139.5 million at the box office, just short of the series-record $142 million for "New Moon" in 2009. 

But $139.5 million is certainly nothing to shake a stick at, and a number of box-office experts are agreed with  the number represents a serious accomplishment, despite coming up just short. 

"When the final numbers come in today, 'Breaking Dawn' will have the fifth-best opening ever, a record I'm sure every studio wouldn't mind having," said Jeff Bock, box-office analyst for Exhibitor Relations. "
And even though 'Breaking Dawn' will always be in the shadow of 'New Moon,' which hit $142 million two years ago when it debuted over the same weekend, 'Breaking Dawn,' and the 'Twilight' franchise in general, is one of those rare commodities in Hollywood that sustains its audience from film to film." 


The question of the drop in revenue from "New Moon" still remains. By normal box-office logic, returns would ramp up in anticipation for the finale, yet the penultimate entry in the series could not top the second. Phil Contrino, editor of Boxoffice.com, said it has to do with the fanbase. 

"I think a healthy portion of the audience is growing up and forgetting about this franchise. It's not enough to put a significant dent in the grosses, but there's definitely an impact," he said. 

As "Breaking Dawn - Part 2" approaches, fans of both the "Harry Potter" and "Twilight" series anxiously await to see which finale will come out on top at the box office. Gitesh Pandya from Box Office Guru said Potter's record will remain. 

"Since 'Part 2' is the final 'Twilight' film, I expect it to open a little higher and maybe even beat 'New Moon,' " Pandya said. "But it won't match the numbers for the final 'Harry Potter' unless it's converted into 3-D."


(Today's Advertisement) 

Download Twilight Breaking Dawn Game


Tuesday, November 22, 2011

 

Twilight: Breaking Dawn Director Bill Condon Discusses Making Two Films At Once

 

Twilight: Breaking Dawn Director Bill Condon 
Discusses Making Two Films At Once image






 
Making a film is not an easy process. There are thousands of moving pieces, scheduling complications, budgetary restrictions, off-days, weather, and the need to maintain constant continuity. But all of those problems become even more intense when you’re shooting two films at the same time, which is exactly what director Bill Condon did while helming The Twilight Saga – Breaking Dawn: Part 1.

I recently had the opportunity to sit down with the filmmaker one on one not only to talk about the two simultaneous productions, but also many other details surrounding the franchise. Check out my interview with Bill Condon below in which he talks about the double edge sword of extremely loyal fans, the involvement of author Stephanie Meyer during production, and the decision of where to cut the book in half.
 
This is something that I want to ask about just to start, which is that the fans are incredibly passionate about these films, the books, the characters everything about it. And obviously with that fever pitch excitement, where it has to be, like, well it has to feel really great.

Right.

But is there a double edged sword to it as well?

I think y'know, well you want to be true to the books but you also want to be true to how you visualize them, how you see them. So in a way, yes. Y'know, I started a relationship with them early on. It was always interesting and occasionally helpful. But it was, at a certain point you're making your movie, and you just hope that it intersects with what they dreamed about when they read it.

Sure. And I guess, because the fans are so passionate about the source material, how much pressure is on you to kind of keep the on-screen portrayal as close to the book as possible?

Well, I think, um... I don't know. I just feel like obviously you make it visual, and that involves a different kind of storytelling sometimes. But I think in general, everyone involved in the movie, starting with Kristen Stewart, is, like, really intent on trying to capture the things that are happening inside of these characters' heads.

Sure. And what do you think it is about this franchise that really has captured so many peoples' love and attention?

I think like anything it's the yearning. I mean, yearning is almost better than getting, y'know? [Laughs] Um, and that's the answer. Because the yearning changes in this movie. But it has been a lot of foreplay and now here we go in this one. And it'll be interesting to see. So much happens here. So much stuff happens to these characters. That's what turned me on. But I do think that initially it was about that sense of, like, there's a certain kind of image that we all have of someone we'd fall in love with. And I think this really speaks to that.




















It was great. It was so great, right from the beginning. I didn't want to do it. She's done an incredible job with this, she knows it better than anybody, and because I think we speak the same language, it was just such a fun part, a fun way to get started on this process. We spent months and months and months when she was just outlining it and writing, and we would just go back and forth. It was really a great experience.


Every day.


Every minute, yes.


Absolutely. It was this invaluable resource, y'know, the person from whose brain all of this came. And you could always just be there and ask about a bit of behavior or a quote or part of a back story that never made it into print. And that was incredibly helpful.

Yeah.

And she was also extremely respectful.


Um...

If you can narrow it down. [Laughs]

Yeah, because it was throughout, y'know? She's part of every bit of the process. Um... y'know, I think I'm going to save that. Because there's a thing in the second movie that... we'll do it next year. [Laughs] I'll take a trip.










Yes.


It sometimes got confusing, but I got to say, because it's one book, and because movie two starts a second after movie one ends, I very early on put the two scripts together. It's like, this is the script. This is the movie we're making. It covers a lot of territory. So that mostly worked, but then sometimes when you sort of turn around and Bella's a vampire, and you turn around and she's dying in childbirth it's kind of, “Oh I'm disoriented, does this happen before or after that?” But mostly, no.


Right, well, that's a big part of their challenge I think.

Sure.

You know, especially Kristen's. Because she is the one who changes the most. Many of these characters are kind of magical creatures who are as they were when they died. But Bella, with this huge transformation, Kristen really had a lot of work to do to keep herself clear. But I think she liked it.


I would love to see it like that, yeah.


Oh, it's um, maybe down the line, I think that would be fun, don't you think? Or make one ten hour movie. 












I thought it was pretty clear. Actually, when I got involved they put it somewhere else, and I didn't think it was right. But it just seemed to me that- um, the other books are told from Bella's point of view. This one has this unique thing of being told from Bella's point of view first, and then Jacob's, and then back to Bella's.

Sure.

The first half seemed to be right at that moment when you shift back to Bella's point of view. And it's opening her eyes and having her become again.


When I first got involved, I think they wanted to send her out on her first hunt.

Ok.

Um, I think that was it. It was the hunt and that didn't seem right to me.

Why?

Because it felt as though... First of all, just good story telling, it's just a great cliffhanger. What is going to happen now? That to me is a huge part of the appeal of the second movie. The first act is, now you've gone throughout the looking glass, it's like we've been watching this from Bella's point of view, but now you're a vampire and you're experiencing that. So it's a big stylistic change, something that to me, it would be jarring to give a taste of that and then stop.


Yes.


Well, if you have a wedding, you've got to do awkward wedding speeches. [Laughs] There's something awful and funny about that. And the same is like, the first time you have sex- you can't do that without being a little funny.

Right.

Because there's such incredible anxiety surrounding it. 












Well, you're right, it is a whole universe that you're getting into. But you have the text, y'know, and that's sort of where it starts. And then you have the author. It's about, Tolkien, y'know, trying to figure out what he's getting at.


Oh yeah, absolutely. Yes.


Oh, so many times. And also, just as you're, y'know, it happens so much in this book and in the whole process of working with Melissa, but then the night before I would shoot a scene I would look at it again. Just to see if there was some other detail or some other approach, some other thing that I want to make sure I got.


To a degree. Yeah.


No. That's the thing that made it- I don't think I would have done it if those movies had all been of a similar style. I think the whole point of it is that there's no stylistic template that you're following. I mean Katherine's is such an indie movie, it's got that great indie spirit as well as capturing the soul of a teenage girl. Chris's is very, very classical, and David's again is incredibly intense and dark. And this one is something else again.


I would say that to me it's in a kind of old tradition. A Hollywood tradition of romantic melodrama. And then it turns, kind of merged with a flat out horror movie.


Right. Um, yeah, that one- when people see it, they'll see that- I just thought this was a neat joke that everyone is screaming at The Bride of Frankenstein and there's a monster right in their midst. But also, y'know, the fact that Bella is in a way the bride of Frankenstein. But, you know, it's one of my favorite movies and I remember hearing stories about- well, it was actually not that movie, it was on Frankenstein- that when it first previewed in Santa Barbara that people were fainting and that someone tracked down the director, James Well, and said, “Were you sleeping?” “Well, yes.” “Well, I'm glad you're awake now because I can't sleep.” [Laughs] People were so upset by it. That visceral reaction you have to horror, y'know, I think that's a hugely exciting part of taking this on.


Oh yeah, definitely, yeah. Also I do think there's a, tonally... horror is usually so ripe, y'know, in a way that it can't help but being done with a little bit of a wink. Here too- it's not like anything is not being taken seriously, but I do think there's something fun about it all.

(Today's Advertisement) 

Download Twilight Breaking Dawn Game

'Twilight Breaking Dawn, Pt 1' Features Long-Awaited Vampire Wedding

 

Robert Pattinson
 and Kristen Stewart star in the Twilight Saga: 
Breaking Dawn- Part 1
Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart star in the Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn- Part 1



Fans around the world are queueing up to see the latest film based on author Stephanie Meyers' Twilight novels. The final book chronicling the romance of teenager Bella and vampire Edward has been split into a pair of films.
The wedding vows may be traditional, but the bride and groom are most unusual. She is a human teenager, just beginning her adult life. He looks like a teen but is actually a 108-year-old vampire. After their picture-perfect wedding in rain-soaked Washington state, Edward whisks Bella off to Brazil for a rainforest honeymoon that starts when he carries her over the threshold.

BELLA "Is this totally necessary?"
EDWARD "I'm nothing if not traditional."

Their idyllic interlude is all-too short. Bella expected Edward to turn her into a vampire so they could share immortality. But before that can happen she becomes pregnant and the baby could be deadly.

While Bella's new vampire in-laws struggle to save her life, her pregnancy threatens to break the fragile peace treaty with their werewolf neighbors.

The combination of teenage romance and supernatural characters has captivated fans of the Twilight novels and films - most of them young women. Kristen Stewart, who stars as Bella, believes the themes resonate with that audience.


Robert Pattinson
 and Kristen Stewart in The Twilight Saga: 
Breaking Dawn-Part 1
Taylor Lautner in The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1

"It's such a far-fetched story and all …but it's really not if you just compare it to somebody who is my age and not in agreement with people that think they are making the wrong decision. That's such a common position," Stewart says.
Robert Pattinson co-stars as Edward. He says, supernatural elements aside, it's basically about the emotions that teenagers everywhere experience.
"He is a 108-year-old guy and he has never achieved anything he has wanted to achieve. He is stuck in adolescence," explains Pattinson. "When you're an adolescent you think nothing is given to you. You think everything is unfair …and he's been living that that for 100 years."
The romantic triangle in the Twilight saga includes Bella's best friend Jacob, who happens to be a werewolf, the mortal enemy of her beloved. He is again played by Taylor Lautner.



 



"Jacob becomes a man in this one and he has to make a lot of decisions," explains Lautner. "He is being torn between his two families so it was really tough. It was by far the most challenging one for me and it's just very exciting to see him in a completely different light than ever before."

Screenwriter Melissa Rosenberg has adapted all of the Twilight novels. But since the first film in 2008, different directors have taken on each chapter. Bill Condon, who helmed the musical Dreamgirls, takes over for Breaking Dawn.
"Obviously it's my take on the material, but you want to make sure that it doesn't betray what people's expectations are and yet still becomes a full cinematic experience," Condon says.


'Twilight: Breaking Dawn' smashes UK box office record 

 

The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1 has broken records to top the UK box office.

The penultimate movie in the supernatural series took over £13.9 million on its opening weekend, making it the biggest opening of a US movie ever in the UK.
Its Friday figure of £6.35 million surpassed the non-3D opening record set by Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part 1 last year.
Director of film at Entertainment One Alex Hamilton said: "We have the highest three-day opening ever for an American film in the UK. I'd like to thank all the fans of Twilight that have given this three-year-old independent distributor a weekend to remember."
Elsewhere in the top ten, Arthur Christmas and The Adventures Of Tintin hold at numbers two and three respectively, while last week’s number one Immortals drops to four. The only other new entry is Justice at seven.

The UK box office top ten is:

1. The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1 - £13,910,877
2. Arthur Christmas - £2,317,953
3. The Adventures Of Tintin: The Secret Of The Unicorn - £988,578
4. Immortals - £950,230
5. In Time - £453,958
6. Tower Heist - £411,888
7. Justice - £276,483
8. Johnny English Reborn - £256,828
9. The Rum Diary - £230,740
10. The Ides Of March - £180,692

Monday, November 21, 2011

How Much Did The Twilight: Breaking Dawn Wedding Cost?


Now that the Twilight Wedding of the Century is out in theaters and we have fed ourselves on its succulent romantic juices, we can get down to doing what you do after any good wedding: gossiping about how much it cost! Luckily, the folks at Centives have done the hard work for us, and the grand total for the whole shebang is… $38,000!

Sure, that is a lot of money, but when you amortize that out over the length of eternity, it's a pretty good value. Especially if you consider that the average American wedding in 2010 cost $27,800, and those were for mere mortals who will realistically only squeeze a few decades of marriage out of it. So actually Edward and Bella's nuptials come off as pretty darn frugal. 

They could have been even more budget-friendly if they hadn't gone so overboard on the flowers, which, using a conservative estimate, cost them $20,000. But they are Edward and Bella! Come on! They deserve all the beautiful flowers in the world. Regardless, the cost of the Twilight wedding still pales in comparison to the Kardashian Wedding Shamtacular(worth all $10 million!) and the Prince William and Kate Middleton Royal Wedding Bonanza (which ran somewhere around $60 million).

 

Twilight's Robert Pattinson on the 'scary' Breaking Dawn sex scene 

 

Twilight's Robert Pattinson on the 'scary' Breaking Dawn sex scene

Well, it’s funny when people talk about the sex scenes in the book because there aren’t actually any, and it’s all people’s imaginations. They think, ‘Oh it’s so hardcore,’ and it fades to black every single time and it just shows little bits of the aftermath. The book is the best example of how to keep something censored and still be kind of erotic.

Like the thing with the feathers, we didn’t mention anything apart from the fact that there’s feathers afterwards and that’s why all the Twilight fans are so fixated on the feathers. It’s like all their fantasies about this story are based on that one image.

But the whole sex scene is just totally in their own heads.

I mean, I guess that’s the only scary thing about doing it in the movie - you have to show something. If you fade to black in the movie a bit then people will go insane.

But at the end of the day, watching some other people have sex is never going to be that spectacular. I mean, hopefully it will be kind of good but it’s a strange thing when there’s so much hype about it. You are like, ‘God, I hope this lives up to it.’

So Edward is very protective of Bella. Who do you feel protective of in your life and how can you relate to that sort of total protectiveness he has?

I guess anyone close to me. When people start talking about your friends or your associations and stuff, that’s the one time I feel like you really have to do something about it.

So are you a little nervous about the reception of this film, or are you pretty blasé these days?

When the book came out, I was like, ‘Wow, [Stephanie Meyer] really just broke the whole box.’ She’s not even thinking outside the box anymore. She went all out in the last one having such an incredibly bizarre storyline. It was really brave, it’s a different genre of movie so I don’t know, hopefully it will be interesting.

 What’s the best thing that fame has brought you?

I am living a life which I had never knew existed, and you can kind of delay being an adult for quite a while. But it’s fun; you get to meet really interesting people. There’s very few jobs where almost everyone in the industry loves their job, and it’s nice to go to work everyday when people are really excited about it and think that they are making something great.

Do you look forward getting past this moment of fame that’s connected to Twilight?

Whenever you get big, it seems you have an equal number of haters and detractors. I remember before Twilight, if there was something on the internet, I mean every single comment would be positive, whereas when you have to do image saturation a little bit, then it just drives people crazy for some reason. But also, the great thing about Twilight fans, they are all very, very vocal and they are very protective of our stuff. And so you always have a kind of army of people defending you.

 

Box office update: 'Twilight: Breaking Dawn' bites into the third-best opening day ever with $72 mil 

 

TWILIGHT-TAYLOR-LAUTNER

The draining of money has begun. The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn — Part 1, the fourth movie in the supernatural-romance franchise, grossed an incredible $72 million on Friday, according to early estimates.

That’s the third-best opening day ever, behind only this year’s Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows — Part 2 ($91.1 million) and 2009′s The Twilight Saga: New Moon ($72.7 million). And while Breaking Dawn fell slightly short of New Moon, it did surpass the opening day of last year’s The Twilight Saga: Eclipse, which debuted to $68.5 million (albeit on a Wednesday).

New Moon is the best comparison point for Breaking Dawn since it hit theaters on the same November weekend two years ago. If Breaking Dawn follows New Moon‘s trajectory, it will drop 42 percent on Saturday and another 34 percent on Sunday. That’d give Breaking Dawn an opening weekend total of about $141 million, which would rank as the fifth-best debut ever (behind Potter, The Dark Knight, Spider-Man 3, and New Moon). An $141 million opening would be a bit below what many box-office prognosticators (myself included) were predicting for Breaking Dawn, but is still an absolutely outstanding start for the film.
Included in the PG-13 movie’s $72 million Friday figure was $30.3 million from Thursday midnight showings — a midnight debut second to only the final Potter film. Breaking Dawn cost $110 million to produce and received a good-but-not-great B+ rating from CinemaScore moviegoers.

The dancing penguins of Happy Feet Two failed to bring fluffy back, as the $135 million animated sequel underperformed by grossing only $5.9 million on Friday. Factoring in a likely Saturday bump from family audiences, the PG-rated flick should finish the weekend with around $22 million. By comparison, the original Happy Feet nearly doubled that amount by debuting to $41.5 million in 2006. Clearly penguins’ moment in the box-office spotlight has passed, which is too bad considering they’re pretty much the coolest animals on Earth.
Among holdovers, Immortals plummeted 74 percent for $3.8 million on Friday. The Adam Sandler comedy Jack and Jill fell 64 percent for $3.5 million. And Puss in Boots swiped $3.4 million — down 62 percent from last week. In limited release, Alexander Payne’s Hawaiian dramedy The Descendants, starring George Clooney, collected an impressive $319,000 from 29 theaters. Check back here on Sunday for the complete box office report.
1. The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn — Part 1 — $72.0 mil
2. Happy Feet Two — $5.9 mil
3. Immortals — $3.8 mil
4. Jack and Jill — $3.5 mil
5. Puss in Boots — $3.4 mil